![]() |
|
||||
|
The duty of care that has been outlined in the AWA is basically 'husbandry'...........what is husbandry? to all intense purposes it means to be a provider. To provide everything what your animals needs.
The AWA is fague to say the least, the Act can be mis-interpreted or maybe we should say, interpreted into whatever side of the arguement you stand on. I think we will all have to wait until to 'code of practice' is written, and as it stands now, consults your vet when you have a snake that wont feed. ![]()
__________________
www.ratsnakefoundation.org Polo Shirts available for pre-order and bookstore open NOW!! 3865
|
|
|||
|
Why would there be any need to feed live prey to big cats ? They will always eat dead prey, as for boids well if they were that picky then I'd have no qualms about feeding live.
Back to your first point on the other thread. There is no law specifically against feeding live prey. There are the unnecessary cruelty parts but nothing that actually prohibits the live feeding itself. Obviously it amounts to almost the same thing, but the wording is different. So it is legal to feed live (ie it currently isnt against the law) but you could well get brought up on a cruelty charge which you would have to prove to the judges satisfaction that you are doing it in the best interests of all the animals. Now if you want to take it to extremes then you could stop us killing animals for food. Which is what the nutters want, then we could all eat veggie and chop down all the forests so we can grow more grain. Mike |
|
||||
|
I haven't started the thread to argue with anyone - just to give people an opportunity to air their views. Masticophis is correct with his/her description of the legislation.
I'll reply to the veggie bit (I'm not veggie or vegan by the way!), apparently (so I've been told) vegetarian land use is less than livestock land use.
__________________
![]() 1.0.1 Bearded Dragons 1.0.0 Mississippi Map turtle 0.0.1 Razorback Musk turtle 1.0.1 Freckled Monitor 2.4.0 Bearded Pygmy Chameleons (Rieppeleon brevicaudatus) 1.1.0 Pitted Pygmy Chameleons (Rhampholeon temporalis) |
|
|||
|
Yes but livestock can use land that isn't suitable to use for agriculture, so to increase the land for food crops you would need to chop down existing forests, to a certain extent the livestock can live on hillsides and stuff like that and still allow them to be pretty natural, well compared to wheat fields.
Mike |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|