|
|||
|
it's the same with all the fuss about fire and ice dragons.
say two people each buy a pair of blood reds off fire and ice. a year and half later they bred and now both parties are looking to sell offspring. 2 adverts will be eg. "baby fire and ice blood red dragons for sale £150 each" "blood red dragons for sale £50 each" which ones gonna sell? common sense suggests that the £50 ones will, but they wont even tho the animal pedigree is exactly the same, the one selling "fire and ice" will sell though because of some name attached to the animals. The initial animals were fire and ice BRED resulting offspring are the purchasers issue. |
|
|||
|
Quote:
__________________
www.durhamdubbers.co.uk 10.2.13Crested Gecko 4.9.0 leopard gecko 1.1.0 Golden Gecko 1.0.0 African Clawed gecko 0.1.0 Tokay Gecko 0.1.0 Marble gecko 0.2.0 African Banded gecko 1.1.0. Yemen Chameleon 0.2.0 Chilean Rose Tarantula 0.1.0 Mexican Blonde tarantula 3.4.0 Giant day geckos 1.0.0 Gehrya marginata 0.1.0. Wahlberg 0.1.0 0.1.0 Moorish gecko 1.1 lygodactylus Picturatus |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Anything else is Fire and Ice line. If I go out and buy a Pepsi, then work out what's in it - and in the right proportions - and make my own cola soft drink to those specifications... it still isn't Pepsi because it's not coming from a Pepsi bottling plant. No matter how chemically perfect I might have gotten it, it's still "Ssthisto Cola, tastes just like Pepsi!" If all it took to get a Fire and Ice dragon was to have a beardie of "just this shade of red" then sure, I wouldn't say someone selling a red beardie that probably has some Fire and Ice ancestors is a "scammer". But the name is a breeder/brand name, not a morph name. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|