
08-11-2009, 05:05 PM
|
|
5 Star Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Slough
Posts: 4,026
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperLover
Here's my opinion on large constricters...
Large Constricters such as Burmese Pythons, Reticulated Pythons and African Rock Pythons SHOULD be classified as DWA. Why?
Well here's why.
There have been many fatalities with people getting "Hugged" a little too tightly by these animals. And because of their stregnth and jaw pressure, they can inflict serious injury. These animals are MORE then capable of breaking free of a cage....And should only belong to specialist keepers or Zoos (DWA Lisence holders and Zoo Exibits)
In Florida, Roughly 3 months ago - A 2 year old child was killed by a large constricter....Not very nice. You don't generally have a problem untill the animal is large enough to see you as food..Or something it can quite easily overpower (Around the 10 foot mark)
Thats my opinion.....Sorry to sound a dick....But ALL Large Constricters should be classified as DWA as along with Venomous animals and Crocodillians.
|
And where would you house the thousands of giants which cannot be legalley kept because the owners simply cannot afford to get the licence??
Giants were considered for inclusion in the 2007 review, and turned down, The reason is that inclusion on Schedule 1 is very specific - to protect the public. It is not to do with protecting the owner, but to ensure they are kept in a way that minimises any threat/risk/danger to members of the public ie they can't escape. Hence the need, in the case of DWA snakes, that the room is also made secure, so that if they did escape from the viv, they cannot get any further.
How likely is it in the UK that a 15 foot python could sneak up unseen if it escaped?
For this reason, it was decided that their inclusion was unwarranted.
|