Go Back   Reptile Forums > General > General Herp Chat



  #11 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-2008, 05:12 PM
rakpeterson's Avatar
Ultra Citizen
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ashford, Kent
Posts: 1,244
Default

a very biased portrayal, with alot of incorrect statements given as fact.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-2008, 05:37 PM
beege_3's Avatar
Ultra Citizen
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central Blackpool
Posts: 1,229
Send a message via AIM to beege_3 Send a message via MSN to beege_3 Send a message via Yahoo to beege_3 Send a message via Skype™ to beege_3
Default

A totally biased portrayal of the care at Shows.
__________________
0.0.1 R. chahoua
0.0.2 R. ciliatus
1.0.0 R. auriculatus
1.0.0 P. regius
1.0.0 Furcifer pardalis Nosy Be
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-2008, 07:44 PM
HadesDragons's Avatar
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chester, Northwest UK
Posts: 9,586
Reviews: 29
Send a message via MSN to HadesDragons
Default

It's pretty biased and is probably intended to mislead people who aren't familiar with reptiles.

There are still some valid points made though - I've never been to Hamm so I don't know whether the film's portrayal of venomous snakes and they way in which they are displayed is accurate or not. If they are really kept in small, plastic tubs such as that then perhaps it's something that should be addressed - like the film says, it's an accident waiting to happen.

I have no doubt that the film makers will have trawled through hours and hours of footage to find the worst examples to make a film a few minutes long, but there are a few shots in there that make me - as a reptile keeper - cringe. The adult beardie in a box around 8-9" long where it is forced to bend and can't move is one example; the baby terrapin in a poly box where it has no land and can't touch the bottom would be another. Most of the stuff they show is just presented out of context - the small boxes are literally display / travel boxes that the animal will be in for a day or so. That said, regardless of your stance as a reptile keeper and regardless of any bias in the film as a whole, there are plenty of areas that shows in general could - and perhaps should - improve on.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-2008, 08:04 PM
Alex M's Avatar
Ultra Citizen
Join Date: May 2008
Location: DORSET
Posts: 1,747
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HadesDragons View Post
It's pretty biased and is probably intended to mislead people who aren't familiar with reptiles.

There are still some valid points made though - I've never been to Hamm so I don't know whether the film's portrayal of venomous snakes and they way in which they are displayed is accurate or not. If they are really kept in small, plastic tubs such as that then perhaps it's something that should be addressed - like the film says, it's an accident waiting to happen.

I have no doubt that the film makers will have trawled through hours and hours of footage to find the worst examples to make a film a few minutes long, but there are a few shots in there that make me - as a reptile keeper - cringe. The adult beardie in a box around 8-9" long where it is forced to bend and can't move is one example; the baby terrapin in a poly box where it has no land and can't touch the bottom would be another. Most of the stuff they show is just presented out of context - the small boxes are literally display / travel boxes that the animal will be in for a day or so. That said, regardless of your stance as a reptile keeper and regardless of any bias in the film as a whole, there are plenty of areas that shows in general could - and perhaps should - improve on.
Totally agreed Hades, those were the images that made me think that the anti's had very fair points too, and i too cringed when i saw some of those shots. There is definitely room for improvement there, some of it looked very out of order regarding animal welfare and the DWA's just left in flimsy tubs on the respective table seems a little irresponsible to say the least.
__________________



At last... After years of atrocities, crimes against humanity and the appalling treatment of millions, it's over. Westlife have split up.
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-2008, 08:05 PM
freekygeeky's Avatar
Posting Deity
Join Date: May 2007
Location: cambridgeshire
Posts: 29,520
Blog Entries: 2
Default

just watched all 18 mins of it.
hmm
and towards teh end of the second one... coach to the show and many RFUK'ers are on it...
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-2008, 08:27 PM
beege_3's Avatar
Ultra Citizen
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central Blackpool
Posts: 1,229
Send a message via AIM to beege_3 Send a message via MSN to beege_3 Send a message via Yahoo to beege_3 Send a message via Skype™ to beege_3
Default

Just a thought, but if anyone can recognise themselves in it then I'm sure they could have the video removed due to not signing a Public Disclosure (i think thats what it's called).. After all, it's pretty derogatory.
__________________
0.0.1 R. chahoua
0.0.2 R. ciliatus
1.0.0 R. auriculatus
1.0.0 P. regius
1.0.0 Furcifer pardalis Nosy Be
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 20-11-2008, 08:46 PM
rakpeterson's Avatar
Ultra Citizen
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ashford, Kent
Posts: 1,244
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by beege_3 View Post
Just a thought, but if anyone can recognise themselves in it then I'm sure they could have the video removed due to not signing a Public Disclosure (i think thats what it's called).. After all, it's pretty derogatory.
I could be wrong but i believe that out in public permission is not needed.

I base this those police programs where people i have seen express a wish not to be filmed and they are told that as long as it is filmed in a public space then no permission is needed.

Please correct me tho if anyone knows different.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 15-12-2011, 11:46 AM
FelixMarmite's Avatar
Forum Citizen
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Plymouth, Devon
Posts: 346
Send a message via MSN to FelixMarmite Send a message via Yahoo to FelixMarmite
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex M View Post
Ahhh the voice of Clifford Warwick, the only reptile biologist i know of with a degree or 2 that refers to snakes as 'poisonous' (funny in itself). Must admit though, i did agree with some of the points he raised in those 2 videos.
I know of him. He was my Auntie's ex partner!
__________________
They called him tortoise because he taught us.
- Alice in Wonderland.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
24/7 nature documenterys khaostim666 Spiders and Inverts 2 03-12-2009 07:25 PM
Do T's (in nature) eat T's? enlightenment Spiders and Inverts 2 14-11-2009 08:32 PM
The Beauty of nature. athy59 General Herp Chat 0 11-05-2009 09:13 AM
Just as nature intended... toyah Snake Pictures 8 28-04-2008 01:57 PM


Help For Heros

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2005 - 2011, Reptile Forums (RFUK™)
Privacy Policy