I just want to point out that the Cambridge Natural Sciences Tripos course is top class. I speak as someone who has gone through it myself and have had the opportunity to compare with courses from other universities. You get a great opportunity to try different subjects within the sciences and an opportunity to really specialise in a chosen field in you second and third year. This is an invaluable opportunity at 18, if you want to go into research, to figure out what kind of field you will be interested in. Hence, I strongly disagree with the comment below:
Quote:
Originally Posted by GRB
don't be fooled into thinking that "Oxbridge" is the only way to go - you'll end up studying "Natural Sciences" which IMO is a waste of time in this era of super specialisation.
|
18 is not a time to specialise but rather a time to discover what you want to specialise in. A Natural Sciences degree from Cambridge or Oxford is very respected around the world and opens many doors. You will also get to meet some of the leading researchers in their field and it is certainly not a waste on time.
I also respectfully disagree with the following in
bold although the rest of the requirements are spot on:
Quote:
Originally Posted by matto2k
you'll need top grades, a huge pile of money and a strong back ground in the choosen subject.
|
This is a big misconception about Oxbridge. In fact, since both of these universities have several times more money than any other university in the UK, they can offer a lot more in terms of bursaries and monetary support for poorer students (something that I and my friends did make use of while we were there). My parents definitely did not have a 'huge pile of money' when I started, in fact, they had no savings whatsoever... Accomodation and food in Cambridge (I assume it is similar in Oxford) is provided by the colleges at hugely subsidised rates and living there is therefore ridiculously cheap and the accomodation standard generally higher than that available on the market at most other universities.
The fact that you don't need to have gone to Oxbridge to get into research is very true (although, I can tell you that it really doesn't hurt your chances). The important thing is to try and get a biology degree from a university with a good reputation for the subject; examples that spring to mind are, York, St Andrews and Edinburgh universities, among others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GRB
You don't actually need to go down the Msc Entomology route if you get a decent 2:1 from a good university.
|
Very true. I went straight into a PhD without doing a Masters with a good 2.1 from Cambridge. However, more and more research groups want students to do a Masters degree, something that I came up against myself. What is frustrating is the lack of funding available for anyone that takes this route, especially in pure research subjects! Not everyone has a spare £4,000-£10,000 (the range that I found) lying around after they finish to spend on another degree, expecially when they are probably already in debt.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GRB
One last thing, keep your options open. It's hard to get established - once you get established in the field, then you can hopefully specialise into tarantulas with greater ease. Trying to do a PhD solely on them for example will probably be met with failure to secure funding. A multi taxa study, using tarantulas as part of a guild of predatory organisms, will probably secure more chance of funding.
|
Finally, this is really great advice

! Patience and the ability to keep an open mind are really important skills for getting to study a particular subject.