![]() |
|
||||
|
Are you part of the organisation of this event Amazon?
Would seem so from your posts? |
|
|||
|
I have no idea who’s being referred to. However, statements such as “He is all about conservation and dead against wild caught stock” is alarming, genuine conservations support the concept of ‘sustainable utilizations’. Being dead against wild caught stock is usually the preserve of ‘protectionists’ – not conservationists!
|
|
|||
|
Quote:
Well Hello Amazon, I really seem to have rattled someone's cage here I don't quite know whether or not to take this as a compliment. You see, I had not realized that even today, an opinion placed by me on a forum, would still carry so much weight behind it, even though I have taken a back seat re the forums for a few years now, and so am not so well known today. This leads me to believe we know each other already, hence the concern, but surely if I am spouting crap, then no need for concern, but yet there is, and I have been singled out too. Good one that. Never mind the other innuendo's, but we must do something about Maureen. That makes me even more interested now.Before I go on, I note that you have chosen to hide behind a name, whilst addressing me, which is a coward's way of handling things when you have chosen to come out with the RSPCA comment above. I now ask you to back up your comment above, by placing the link to the site you refer to above on here for all to go to, including myself as it's the first I have heard of it, and if it's truly as you are indicating, then surely I would have known about it? When it comes to conservation, I am very much for it, so don't even go there please. It's a poor attempt at trying to get back at me for having a personal opinion about certain so called 'experts' being involved, which I consider to be a very inaccurate statement to have made, and I stand by that even now with regards to the article in the paper as it then read. You choose to stay in hiding, but by your words here, I assume you are representing someone involved with the project, maybe even your hidden self and with this in mind, I now say to you, that if you, or others wish to take me to court for 'libel' re my comment about the 'hobby' being doomed if in the hands of those so called experts, then please go ahead, as it would give me the perfect opportunity to have certain facts placed out there in the 'media' circle, that I could back up if so required. My views on Trevor Smith in case you are interested, are totally different, and Trevor has my utmost respect, and yes I do consider him to be an 'expert'. I will finish now, but remind you to please put the link here for all, myself included, to be able to go and look at. I will accept if you choose not to add your real name in your next post, but will not respect you for it, as I always believe that if your confident about what you are saying and doing, and have nothing to hide, then you will identify yourself when making such posts as yours, just as I chose not to hide my true thoughts and feelings, and so posted using my 'real name'. We shall see. Maureen.
__________________
"If you talk with the animals they will talk with you and you will know each other. If you do not talk to them, you will not know them and what you do not know, you will fear. What one fears, one destroys." Chief Dan George (1899-1981) |
|
|||
|
I dont know what the issue is with this place/event but would just like to say that Trevor Smith most certainly is a very well respected and knowledgeable man in his field,one of the best.(i have no connection to any of this but know Trevor and his brother well).
|
|
|||
|
There will always be those opposed to the trade in wild animals, both pro and anti keepers. However, sustainable utilisation is a highly beneficial conservation tool recognised by most serious conservation bodies, such as WWF. Personally I find it somewhat hypercritical if keepers are opposed to such trade as the animal they keep were at some point from the wild!
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|