Can we Say " places to avoid" ?? - Page 2

buddy · #11 (**permalink**) 15-06-2008, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Razzler79

you might be able to let people leave a positive rating (1-10) on their satisfaction without leaving comments, then the places that aren't so great won't have a high rating. you'll only be asking customers to identify their positive experiences and not to highlight any negatives.

(e.g. our users rated this service 7/10 stars)

i think this is a great idea then it is not your slating them its customers experiences

you know what they say "CUSTOMER IS ALWAYS RIGHT " (not) but not in my job lol

Dextersdad · #12 (**permalink**) 15-06-2008, 02:52 PM

I'll be naming and shaming whenever the need arises. So try and sue me.

cornmorphs · #13 (**permalink**) 15-06-2008, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dextersdad

Mate, if I want to say to avoid a place and give my frank opinions then I shall do so.

I've done it before and would do so again.

stupid isnt it, i wish it was that simple

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dextersdad

I'll be naming and shaming whenever the need arises. So try and sue me.

thing is, they will.. theres no point being all jumed up and cocky about it.. even if you probably are right. there has been numerous places i wanted to shame, but at the risk of getting sued i just dont.
i hate the laws in this country, places are quick enough to take praise,but the second you say something they dont like, well thats it.. court.

SiUK · #14 (**permalink**) 15-06-2008, 03:36 PM

so how do things like watchdog get away with it?

Meko · #15 (**permalink**) 15-06-2008, 03:40 PM

Rather than give places to avoid let people review a shop. That way they can give their opinion on their experience and its nothing to do with the owner of the site (you'll need the disclaimer though)

cornmorphs · #16 (**permalink**) 15-06-2008, 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SiUK

so how do things like watchdog get away with it?

i dunno, i guess they are workin on behalf of the public and are always right.
they would have been sued by now i guess if they werent allowed.

Andy b 1 · #17 (**permalink**) 15-06-2008, 04:05 PM

they have the proof?

captaincarot · #18 (**permalink**) 15-06-2008, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Andy b 1

they have the proof?

they have the MONEY to fight the lible action. so people won't start the fight in the first place.

cornmorphs · #19 (**permalink**) 15-06-2008, 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by captaincarot

they have the MONEY to fight the lible action. so people won't start the fight in the first place.

also being shown to be wrong on natioanl tv kinda says it all really.. how can you fight that?

Dextersdad · #20 (**permalink**) 16-06-2008, 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cornmorphs

stupid isnt it, i wish it was that simple

thing is, they will.. theres no point being all jumed up and cocky about it.. even if you probably are right. there has been numerous places i wanted to shame, but at the risk of getting sued i just dont.
i hate the laws in this country, places are quick enough to take praise,but the second you say something they dont like, well thats it.. court.

I'm neither being jumped up or cocky about it. Just saying it like it is so please no personal slurs against me.

If I get someone trying to sue me then so be it let them try. I've been careful to only say what I see. It's not a case of instantly going to court. Luckily I have a good contact who is a solicitor so I consult there first

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode