![]() |
|
||||
|
If you have a litter of sixteen you could get anything from all normals to all sunglows. The chance of "1 in 16" is per OFFSPRING not per litter.
Hypo is dominant, so an animal with one copy looks the same as an animal with two copies. SS looks the same as Ss - and only an ss is normal. Anything that is SS or Ss will be visually hypo. Anything that is ss is visually not hypo and does not carry hypo. Anything that is aa is visually albino. Anything that is AA or Aa is visually non-albino and would be considered "possible hets". Therefore, your punnett square shows: SSAA - Homozygous hypo, non-albino (1:16 chance per offspring) SSAa - Homozygous hypo, non-albino but het for albino (1:8 chance per offspring) SSaa - Homozygous hypo, albino AKA Sunglow (1:16 chance per offspring) SsAA - Heterozygous hypo, non-albino (1:8 chance per offspring) SsAa - Heterozygous hypo, non-albino but het for albino (1:4 chance per offspring) Ssaa - Heterozygous hypo, albino AKA Sunglow (1:8 chance per offspring) ssAA - Non-hypo, non-albino (1:16 chance per offspring) ssAa - Non-hypo, non-albino but het for albino (1:8 chance per offspring) ssaa - Non-hypo, albino (1:16 chance per offspring). All your non-albinos would be CALLED "66% chance het Albino" as there's a two in three chance they inherited the albino gene from one parent or the other. The homozygous hypos might be distinguishable from the heterozygous hypos but there's no guarantee.
__________________
- Ssthisto ![]() ![]() ![]() Lizards: 2.2 E. macularius, 1.2 H. caudicinctus, 1.0 R. ciliatus, 0.2.1 A. fragilis, 1.1 T. merianae, 1.0 V. niloticus ittibittius Colubrids: 4.4.8 P. guttattus, 1.0 P. guttatus X E. climacophora, 1.0 P. o. rossalini, 1.0 P. o. lindheimeri, 0.1 E. anomala, 0.1 C. radiatus 1.2 Lamprophis spp, 1.0 L. g. nigritus, 0.1 L. g. californiae, 1.0 H. n. nasicus Boids: 1.1 E. c. maurus, 0.1 E. conicus, 4.1.6 P. regius, 1.1 A. maculosa We HAD a three-bedroom house... Current lodgers: 1.0 E. c. maurus, 1.1 E. c. loveridgei |
|
||||
|
Yeah, it'd be nice if you were guaranteed those perfect ratios, but what it really is would be more like flipping two pennies and two tenpence - what you need is at least one heads on the tenpence and BOTH pennies to be heads in order to get a Sunglow - but each flip of the coin is independent to any other flip.
__________________
- Ssthisto ![]() ![]() ![]() Lizards: 2.2 E. macularius, 1.2 H. caudicinctus, 1.0 R. ciliatus, 0.2.1 A. fragilis, 1.1 T. merianae, 1.0 V. niloticus ittibittius Colubrids: 4.4.8 P. guttattus, 1.0 P. guttatus X E. climacophora, 1.0 P. o. rossalini, 1.0 P. o. lindheimeri, 0.1 E. anomala, 0.1 C. radiatus 1.2 Lamprophis spp, 1.0 L. g. nigritus, 0.1 L. g. californiae, 1.0 H. n. nasicus Boids: 1.1 E. c. maurus, 0.1 E. conicus, 4.1.6 P. regius, 1.1 A. maculosa We HAD a three-bedroom house... Current lodgers: 1.0 E. c. maurus, 1.1 E. c. loveridgei |
|
||||
|
Yup, the more times you flip the coins, the more chances you have to get the exact flip you need... but the more chances you ALSO have to get all of the other possible results!
__________________
- Ssthisto ![]() ![]() ![]() Lizards: 2.2 E. macularius, 1.2 H. caudicinctus, 1.0 R. ciliatus, 0.2.1 A. fragilis, 1.1 T. merianae, 1.0 V. niloticus ittibittius Colubrids: 4.4.8 P. guttattus, 1.0 P. guttatus X E. climacophora, 1.0 P. o. rossalini, 1.0 P. o. lindheimeri, 0.1 E. anomala, 0.1 C. radiatus 1.2 Lamprophis spp, 1.0 L. g. nigritus, 0.1 L. g. californiae, 1.0 H. n. nasicus Boids: 1.1 E. c. maurus, 0.1 E. conicus, 4.1.6 P. regius, 1.1 A. maculosa We HAD a three-bedroom house... Current lodgers: 1.0 E. c. maurus, 1.1 E. c. loveridgei |
|
||||
|
Well, one in 4 is 25%.
One in 8 is 12.5%. One in 16 is 6.25%.
__________________
- Ssthisto ![]() ![]() ![]() Lizards: 2.2 E. macularius, 1.2 H. caudicinctus, 1.0 R. ciliatus, 0.2.1 A. fragilis, 1.1 T. merianae, 1.0 V. niloticus ittibittius Colubrids: 4.4.8 P. guttattus, 1.0 P. guttatus X E. climacophora, 1.0 P. o. rossalini, 1.0 P. o. lindheimeri, 0.1 E. anomala, 0.1 C. radiatus 1.2 Lamprophis spp, 1.0 L. g. nigritus, 0.1 L. g. californiae, 1.0 H. n. nasicus Boids: 1.1 E. c. maurus, 0.1 E. conicus, 4.1.6 P. regius, 1.1 A. maculosa We HAD a three-bedroom house... Current lodgers: 1.0 E. c. maurus, 1.1 E. c. loveridgei |
|
||||
|
if i have this right you should get
(SSaa "Sa" x SsAa) Sa SA SSAa Sa SSaa sA SsAa sa Ssaa so potentially you would get (if im right dont quote me): 1/4= SSAa or super salmon het albino 1/4= SSaa or super sunglow (need to be proved geentically through breeding) 1/4=SsAa salmon het albino 1/4= Ssaa sunglow Im sure ssthisto will correct me |
|
||||
|
There's nothing saying a sunglow HAS to be homozygous hypo... so you'd be looking at SSaa or Ssaa as a sunglow.
You've still got the possibility of getting non-hypo offspring if you don't have a homozygous hypo Sunglow.
__________________
- Ssthisto ![]() ![]() ![]() Lizards: 2.2 E. macularius, 1.2 H. caudicinctus, 1.0 R. ciliatus, 0.2.1 A. fragilis, 1.1 T. merianae, 1.0 V. niloticus ittibittius Colubrids: 4.4.8 P. guttattus, 1.0 P. guttatus X E. climacophora, 1.0 P. o. rossalini, 1.0 P. o. lindheimeri, 0.1 E. anomala, 0.1 C. radiatus 1.2 Lamprophis spp, 1.0 L. g. nigritus, 0.1 L. g. californiae, 1.0 H. n. nasicus Boids: 1.1 E. c. maurus, 0.1 E. conicus, 4.1.6 P. regius, 1.1 A. maculosa We HAD a three-bedroom house... Current lodgers: 1.0 E. c. maurus, 1.1 E. c. loveridgei |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|