Let's keep this constructive. I agree with the idea of the "right" rather than the "privilege". As the poster above noted, you can have your rights taken away for legitimate reasons, eg right to freedom deprived because you committed a serious crime, or right to keep dogs if you used them in dogfighting. I don't have a problem with people losing their right to keep animals IF they are deliberately and systematically abusing their animals. My major concern is that at the moment the concepts of "abuse" are being twisted cynically by the AR lobby.
Pet shops are IMHO necessary for the hobby. They provide part of the infrastructure whereby animal keepers of all persuasions can obtain equipment and food. Some of us may be able to build our own vivaria, but let's face it, we would be hard pressed to obtain insects in winter or dried fish food. Pet shops are subject to the law and bad ones are hopefully weeded out.
As to ARs being against pet keeping, it is on record that Ingrid Newkirk, head of PETA, regards it with a very jaundiced eye.
|