Reptile Forums UK  

Go Back   Reptile Forums UK > General > General Herp Chat > Hobby Issues & Information

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 23-10-2007, 09:17 PM
RFUK Premium Membership
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,389
Send a message via MSN to TSKA Rory Matier
Default Quiet DWAL Opposition

Anyone actually wonder why the RSPCA and the Antis did not kick up a stink with the species being lifted from the DWAL?

Especially on the primate side?

R

PKL
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 23-10-2007, 09:17 PM
SiUK's Avatar
Somerset boy
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: South west
Posts: 12,550
Default

yeh I did actually
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 23-10-2007, 09:28 PM
Snakes r grreat's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 5,961
Send a message via MSN to Snakes r grreat
Default

Because they probably know that it WILL cause problems when idiots get their hands on them, cant look after them properly, then let them lose or hand them over to the RSPCA. The RSPCA and the antis can then go look at this massive problem of keeping exotics, lets ban it to save the animals.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 23-10-2007, 09:28 PM
Fangio's Avatar
Premier Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 8,015
Default

I did read something about the rspca not being happy with the lifting of the primates. Can't remember where though.
__________________


Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 23-10-2007, 09:33 PM
RFUK Premium Membership
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,389
Send a message via MSN to TSKA Rory Matier
Default unless

...........of course they knew something we did not, eh?

R
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 23-10-2007, 09:33 PM
Premier Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 8,976
Default

it was probably so they didnt publisize it, hoping less people will notice, and less people will get them
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 23-10-2007, 09:37 PM
Gold Star Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Over the hills and far away
Posts: 5,116
Send a message via MSN to darkdan99 Send a message via Skype™ to darkdan99
Default

there was a small press release from the RSPCA but they wernt their usual selves.

I think it was a tactical. They are waiting for the shakeup with regional guidfelins etc and are wanting to make it harder for DWALs to be issued.

There line is going to be "well the less harmless have been taken off so these are all deadly"

AND ALSO FOR WHEN THEY HAVE TO RESCUE A PRIMATE ETC THEY CAN SAY "THEY SHOULDNT HAVE BEEN TAKEN OFF" And then get them replaced.

(soz bout caps)
__________________
SnakeyDan
Offline most of the time due to my being chucked out and not having net at my new home. lol. If anyone wants me feel free to call. 07989665196.
22/02/1962-04/09/2006-thank-you
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 23-10-2007, 10:19 PM
RFUK Premium Membership
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 1,389
Send a message via MSN to TSKA Rory Matier
Default In many ways Dan

........correct.
But for the last three years l ahve been saying that primates may be prohibited from private keeping.

That could now well happen.

By 2008 that could be in place.

Ok so you guys may not be primate keepers, but if they do enact that piece of legis out as a policy now, signed off by the same juinor Minister that signed off the EPS legis, then it will notbe long before they really start to win hands down other fraternities.

R
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 24-10-2007, 09:48 PM
miffikins's Avatar
Premier Citizen
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Manchester/Swansea
Posts: 2,125
Default

I was wondering that too. But there are now specific guidelines in place for the keeping of primates under the Animal Welfare Act 2006 that people will have to adhere to by law. Maybe thats why species like tamarins and squirrel monkeys came off, they can prosecute anyone not following these specific guidelines.

But if you ask me, ALL primates should be DWA for the sake of their own welfare. Not many people in South Wales would have paid over 2 grand for a DWA so they can have a lil' monkey sat on their shoulder....

__________________
Kate

2.2.2 - Eublepharis macularius 0.1.0 - Sceloporus malachiticus 1.1.0 - Varanus acanthurus brachyurus 0.0.1 - Tiliqua gigas evanescens 0.4.0 - Felis catus 1.0.0 - Fat, old goldfish
Lots of tropical fish...

DeansOnToast has a pretty face and PhiPhi, well hes helping me make things out of polystyreeeeeeene!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 26-10-2007, 04:29 PM
Dan's Avatar
Dan Dan is offline
5 Star Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,726
Send a message via MSN to Dan
Default

Don't have much time for here today so sorry if the following is too abrupt.

Miffikins, the DWA is in place to protect the PUBLIC. When people start abusing it and using it for other purposes we get problems. There is no need for your line of thought to make things worse.

Rory, i have glossed over your comments on the other thread. I'll reply when i get chance or give me a bell, either way's good.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Exotic Pet Sites


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2005 - 2008, Reptile Forums UK (RFUK™)