![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Is devenomation acceptable? | |||
| I think it's OK |
|
28 | 10.81% |
| I think it's wrong |
|
193 | 74.52% |
| Undecided |
|
38 | 14.67% |
| Voters: 259. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Personally I dont agree wqith venomoids in any way shape or form, I understand the training argument, but the bottom line for me is you are altering a snake to keep it. ALthough I dont have stats i have several friends who have kept them and all have found they died prematurely with the exception of a venomoid elapid, and for no apparent reason. I am sure there are people who have kept them alive but that isnt my experience, Interestingly the people who have had these deaths, kept venomoids vipers.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Morphs are naturally occuring, removing venom glands isn't. Fair enough you get your designer morphs that are unlikely to happen in the wild, but, there's nothing stopping them from breeding in the wild.. it would still be a natural occurence. I don't know anything about Corns, so anything mentioned about them is above me. If some died? Then i'll assume this happened because nobody put a knife to it's throat and removed organs from it's body? ![]() I've heard the cobra story, that's starting to sound like a broken record. Can you start another story about something else, rattle snake perhaps? Don't worry, i won't go researching it, because it makes no difference to me. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() Love it! In that case there's a 900yr old, 10ft pygmy rattler that had the surgery done by one of Mikes ancestors and it's still alive today, so there. I'm going to guess that if corns are no good as a reference then boas wont be either. The form of albino boa that is prone to producing deformed babies (ie missing eyes) would be a good substitute if boas are better for you.
__________________
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now i'm convinced, and the entire venomoid community has my support If this is a naturally occuring thing in boas, and humans are not removing the eyes, then human intervention hasn't taken place.. this is the way i see it - humans will have selectively bred the boa for albinism, and because of this we have no choice but to accept what is produced, i don't see how bringing a knife and physically removing glands from a healthy animal has much to do with it... but I don't know enough about the story to really form any conclusion. Humans can be born blind, deaf, abnormal etc... Last edited by royalpython; 15-11-2007 at 11:00 AM.. |
|
|||
|
Just because people on forums haven't proved that venom aids in snake digestion, doesn't mean it isn't true. And to everyone who said they haven't found a scientific study or any research showing that venom has any function in digestion, you obviously didn't bother looking. And just because people who have kept a few venemoids haven't noticed a difference in digestion, so what? How would they have any idea what they are talking about? Visual clues aren't always given to the stresses an animal is under. And people who breed snakes are more often than not just enthusiasts. They don't study their animals with any reliablility, they just produce 'informed opinions' to support their own actions. What a load of $#1^!
If any of you are biologists (like me) and have access to sciencedirect, wiley interscience or any other online journal database you can read MANY good papers about the digestive function of snake venom. It has been proved many times over and for many different species of venomous snake. One of the best, and earliest, is this one... The effect of rattlesnake venom on the digestion of prey. (Thomas & Pough, 1979) ScienceDirect - Toxicon : The effect of rattlesnake venom on digestion of prey Also see.... The Myonecrotic Effect of Duvernoy's Gland Secretion of the Snake Thamnophis elegans vagrans (Jansen, 1987) http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-1511(198703)21%3A1%3C81%3ATMEODG%3E2.0.CO%3B2-B Venom Function in the Puerto Rican Racer, Alsophis portoricensis (Serpentes: Colubridae) (Rodriguez-Robles and Thomas, 1992) http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=004...OR-enlargePage There is also a rather good study demonstrating that venom may be an evolutionary product of digestive enzymes..... Venom Toxins: Plausible Evolution from Digestive Enzymes (Kochvar et al., 1983). Venom Toxins: Plausible Evolution from Digestive Enzymes -- KOCHVA et al. 23 (2): 427 -- American Zoologist To me, removing a snake's natural defence, prey immobilisation and a primary method to speed digestion is castration and is cruel. You are disabling your snake. The beauty of keeping animals for me is to appreciate the wonderful variety and complexity of life. Standardising your animals is just pointless and constitutes and insult to them and their wonder. If you want to keep animals, keep the ones which you can manage. Don't just modify the ones you want to make them easier to look after, they arent toys. Just my opinion anyway.
__________________
0.0.3 Triturus marmoratus 1.1.0 Leptopelis vermiculatus 1.0.3 Litoria caerulea 2.1.0 Chiromantis xerampelina 1.1.2 Hyperolius sp. 2.0.0 Sphodromantis lineola 0.0.2 Phyllocrania paradoxa 0.1.0 Pogona vitticeps 1.1.0 Eublepharis macularius 1.1.0 Gekko ulikovskii 1.0.0 Pantherophis guttatus guttatus 1.0.0 Physignathus cocincinus 1.0.0 Boa constrictor constrictor 0.1.0 Grammostola rosea Last edited by Rsmith4040; 15-11-2007 at 11:21 AM.. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|