I'm just picking up on another thread which brought out some opinions from some users that the spider gene shouldn't be bred anymore. I personally tend to agree with this, but wondered what the general consensus was amongst other users.
My reasoning is that with so many beautiful snakes around in their pure form and / or with less problematic genetics, I personally don't feel that propagating a genetic trait known to carry so many negatives should be encouraged by the hobby. However, if people buy, (some) breeders will supply.
What do others think? It'd be especially great to hear from long term hobbyists, as well as breeders on this.
(I'm hoping not to turn this into a debate on whether the spider gene is safe or not, as I believe it is widely acknowledged by most that it does carry with it certain issues. The debate I am prompting is to get the view of the hobby and those within it on the ongoing use of this gene and whether it should be phased out and, if so, how this could / should happen.)
Please do keep it friendly folks - remember, it is a forum for friendly debate, even if people have differing views.
My reasoning is that with so many beautiful snakes around in their pure form and / or with less problematic genetics, I personally don't feel that propagating a genetic trait known to carry so many negatives should be encouraged by the hobby. However, if people buy, (some) breeders will supply.
What do others think? It'd be especially great to hear from long term hobbyists, as well as breeders on this.
(I'm hoping not to turn this into a debate on whether the spider gene is safe or not, as I believe it is widely acknowledged by most that it does carry with it certain issues. The debate I am prompting is to get the view of the hobby and those within it on the ongoing use of this gene and whether it should be phased out and, if so, how this could / should happen.)
Please do keep it friendly folks - remember, it is a forum for friendly debate, even if people have differing views.