Most herpers are more or less confused about the difference between tyrosinase negative and tyrosinase positive albinos.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step. The journey along the biosynthetic pathway from tyrosine to melanin begins with a single step, too, but it does not end with the first step. Many steps are required to make melanin. Normal tyrosinase catalyses the first two steps in that pathway. A T-neg albino has either malfunctioning tyrosinase or no tyrosinase so cannot make melanin. Result: an animal without melanin.
The test for T-neg albinism is to make a solution containing the third chemical in the melanin biosynthetic pathway and to put a bit of albino skin in the solution. This skips the steps requiring tyrosinase. If the skin develops melanin, then tyrosinase is the problem. The animal is a T-neg albino. If the skin does not develop melanin, then the problem is not the tyrosinase. And the animal is a T-positive albino.
There are many causes for T-positive albinism, too many to go into here.
The only way to distinguish between T-neg and T-pos albinos is by the test I discribed above. This test has not been done on most albino reptiles. It has not been done on either the Kahl or Sharp albino boa constrictor, it hasn't been done on the albino ball python, and, as far as I know, it hasn't been done on any albino gecko.
Another problem is that there has been a tendency to call reptiles without visible melanin T-neg albinos and reptiles with a little visible melanin T-positive albinos. It doesn't work that way. There can be T-positive albinos with no visible melanin. In other words, there is no way to just look at an animal and say that it is T-neg or T-pos albino.
Without the test, an albino without visible melanin can be either a T-neg or a T-pos albino. An albino with some visible melanin must have working tyrosinase. But is it an albino if it has some visible melanin? The situation is a mess. :censor:
Until tests are done, about all we can do is treat T-neg albino and T-pos albino as names with no connection to biochemical reality.